Connect with us

iGaming

MACAU CONCESSIONAIRES COMMIT MOP9BN TO GOVERNMENT DIVERSIFICATION FUND

Macau’s six casino concessionaires have signed up as limited partners in the government’s Guidance Fund No. 2, committing a combined MOP9bn (about US$1.1bn) that counts towards their non-gaming investment obligations.

Published

on

Macau Concessionaires Commit Mop9Bn To Government Diversification Fund

Macau’s six casino concessionaires have committed a combined MOP9bn (about US$1.1bn) to a new government investment vehicle aimed at diversifying the territory’s economy away from gaming.

The operators signed on as limited partners in the Macao SAR Government Guidance Fund No. 2 on 23 October, at a ceremony attended by Chief Executive Sam Hou Fai, according to reports in the Asian gaming trade press.

Who is paying what

The fund launches with about MOP20bn (roughly US$2.5bn) in capital. MOP11bn comes from the government’s fiscal reserves and the remaining MOP9bn from the six concessionaires.

Sands China is the largest contributor at MOP2.30bn, followed closely by Galaxy Entertainment Group at MOP2.27bn. Wynn Macau has committed MOP1.37bn, MGM China MOP1.24bn, SJM Holdings MOP992.7m and Melco Resorts & Entertainment MOP828m. The split broadly tracks each operator’s scale in the market.

Crucially for the operators, each contribution will be credited directly against the mandatory non-gaming investment obligations written into their current 10-year concession contracts, which began in 2023 and run through 2032.

How the fund will work

The vehicle has an initial term of 15 years, with the first five years set aside as the investment period, and allows up to two one-year extensions. It will be managed by Macau Investment and Management Co Ltd. The casino operators sit as limited partners only and will have no role in day-to-day management or investment decisions.

The fund will target sectors identified under the government’s “1+4” diversification strategy, including financial services, healthcare, technology and life sciences, as well as projects linked to Hengqin and the wider Greater Bay Area.

Diversification or relabelling?

Beijing and the Macau government have pressed the concessionaires since the 2022 re-tender to show that the territory’s casino industry can support a broader economy. The concession contracts require operators to invest heavily in non-gaming attractions and activities, and the scale of those commitments has drawn close scrutiny from investors as gross gaming revenue has recovered.

Commentators in the trade press have questioned whether the guidance fund will deliver genuine diversification or simply move part of the operators’ existing obligations into a pooled vehicle run by a state-owned manager. For the concessionaires, the arrangement offers a predictable way to discharge part of what they owe, without having to develop and run each non-gaming project themselves.

The first five-year investment window will show which reading is right. How quickly the fund deploys capital, and into what, will be watched closely by investors as the concessions run towards their 2032 expiry.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

iGaming

STAR ENTERTAINMENT ORDERED TO PAY A$260M PENALTY IN AUSTRAC AML CASE

The Federal Court of Australia has ordered The Star Entertainment Group to pay a A$260m penalty over serious AML/CTF breaches, below the A$400m AUSTRAC sought, in four instalments over 19 months.

Published

on

Star Entertainment Ordered To Pay A$260M Penalty In Austrac Aml Case

The Star Entertainment Group has been ordered by the Federal Court of Australia to pay a A$260m civil penalty for serious breaches of the country’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws, ending a case brought by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) in 2022.

Justice Cameron Moore handed down the judgment on Wednesday 28 October. The penalty comprises A$195m relating to Star’s Sydney casino and A$65m relating to its Queensland operations. Star has 19 months to pay the sum in four equal instalments, with the first due within 28 days of judgment, according to the Australian Associated Press.

Court splits the difference

The figure lands between the positions put to the court. AUSTRAC had sought A$400m, while Star argued that anything above A$100m, particularly if payable within 12 months, could push it into liquidation. Justice Moore found the lower figure too light and the higher one excessive.

The judge described the contraventions as serious and “not mere oversights from time to time”, calling the conduct egregious and the number of contraventions immeasurable. “In effect, Star put profit ahead of compliance and did so on a large scale,” he said, according to reports of the judgment.

He also took account of penalties already imposed. Star has received A$200m in penalties for conduct that significantly overlaps with the AUSTRAC case, the judge noted, and he said the fine would have been higher without the remediation now under way at the group.

Junkets and high-risk customers

AUSTRAC’s case centred on Star’s failure to maintain a compliant AML/CTF programme and to carry out appropriate ongoing customer due diligence. The regulator alleged that Star failed to properly address money laundering risks arising from its dealings with the Asian junket operator Suncity and its funder, and continued to deal with them after becoming aware of reports linking them to criminal activity. The court heard that a customer with known criminal links moved hundreds of millions of dollars through the casino.

AUSTRAC chief executive Brendan Thomas said the court had found Star allowed high-risk customers to gamble without properly establishing the source of their funds, and that junkets were permitted to engage in highly suspicious activity without controls while retaining access to private gaming rooms. Because of Star’s admitted monitoring failures, the regulator said it cannot know how much money high-risk customers moved through the casinos.

“AUSTRAC will not tolerate companies putting profit over their obligations to the Australian community,” Thomas said in a statement.

Pressure on a fragile balance sheet

The penalty falls on a company that has spent much of the past five years fighting for survival. Star reported a A$307m loss for the 2026 financial year, narrower than the A$428m loss a year earlier, and its auditor EY warned in August of material uncertainties over its ability to continue as a going concern. A A$300m rescue package backed by US operator Bally’s Corporation and the Mathieson family saved the business from administration in April 2025.

Star requested a trading halt on the ASX ahead of the judgment, with shares last trading at A$0.13, against A$3.70 when casino regulators began investigating the group in late 2021. The halt runs until the earlier of an announcement or the start of trading on Friday 30 October. At the time of writing Star had not set out how it intends to fund the instalments. The judge observed that the company would likely need to raise money to meet the penalty.

The ruling came a day after Star’s annual general meeting, where chair Soo Kim, who also chairs Bally’s, told shareholders that “the fire is out” and that rebuilding could begin. On the same day Star reported positive quarterly earnings and operating cash flow for the first time in two years.

The penalty is the third major AUSTRAC casino outcome in recent years, following the A$450m penalty imposed on Crown Melbourne and Crown Perth in 2023 and SkyCity Adelaide’s A$67m penalty in 2024. Justice Moore said comparisons with the Crown case were of limited use given significant differences between the matters. Star’s next step will be its response to the ASX once the halt lifts, with investors watching for any capital raising needed to meet the first payment next month.

Continue Reading

iGaming

US IGAMING GROWTH SLOWS TO RECORD-LOW 12% IN Q3, CITIZENS DATA SHOWS

US online casino revenue grew 12% year on year in the third quarter of 2026, the slowest rate on record, according to Citizens equity research, while sports betting handle held steady.

Published

on

Us Igaming Growth Slows To Record-Low 12% In Q3, Citizens Data Shows

US online casino revenue grew 12% year on year in the third quarter of 2026, the slowest rate on record, according to data from Citizens equity research, while sports betting held steady despite one fewer week of NFL action in the period.

The figures, published in a Citizens research note this week and reported by ReadWrite, Gambling News and the trade press, show a steady deceleration through the year. iGaming revenue growth stood at 19% in the first quarter and 16% in the second before easing to 12% in the three months to 30 September. Analysts described the slowdown as broadly in line with their expectations. The note does not appear to have been made public, and the reported data cover growth rates and market shares rather than a dollar total for the quarter.

Within the quarter, growth picked up slightly at the end. Citizens put September iGaming growth at 12%, compared with 11% in August.

Launch boost fades

Part of the slowdown reflects the fading effect of recent launches. Citizens pointed to the arrival of bet365 and Hard Rock in Michigan and West Virginia as a factor whose impact was now wearing off.

The leading operators kept their positions, but the top three all lost share over the year. FanDuel remained the largest iGaming operator with 25.1% of revenue, down from 26.6% a year earlier. DraftKings held 22.2%, down from 24.3% year on year but up from 20.9% in the second quarter, its first sequential gain in two years. Citizens linked the improvement to changes DraftKings made to its business model in the spring. BetMGM’s share fell to 18.6% from 20.7%, a sixth straight quarterly decline.

Fanatics was the standout, lifting its share to 5.2% from 3.9% a year earlier, though slightly below the 5.4% it held in the second quarter.

State data tells a similar story

September figures from state regulators broadly match the picture of slower but still positive growth. In New Jersey, the Division of Gaming Enforcement reported internet gaming win of $274.8m, up 13.0% year on year, as New Jersey’s online casino market continued to grow at a double-digit pace. Pennsylvania’s growth was more modest: the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board reported that Pennsylvania iGaming revenue rose 6.82% to $249.3m, with slots doing most of the work.

Michigan, the largest of the three by monthly online casino receipts, reported iGaming gross receipts of $300.2m for September and adjusted gross receipts of about $288.2m, according to the Michigan Gaming Control Board’s monthly release.

Sports betting steady

Sports betting proved more resilient. Citizens data showed third-quarter handle up about 7% year on year, even with one fewer week of NFL play in the period, according to reports of the note. Same-store handle rose 1% in September, the strongest monthly growth of 2026 outside June and July, when the World Cup lifted volumes.

DraftKings led on handle with a 37.6% share, up from 37.3%, ahead of FanDuel at 32.8%, up from 31.4%. Fanatics’ handle share fell to 9.9% from 11.2%, although its share of sports betting revenue rose to 8.8% from 7.3%. Among hold rates, BetMGM improved to 10.2% from 9.6%, Caesars fell to 6.9% from 7.6%, and bet365 held at 9.4%.

State-level sports betting results were mixed in September as early NFL results swung hold. New Jersey’s sports wagering revenue fell 14.3% to $77.0m, while Pennsylvania’s revenue jumped 50.45% to $44.7m on handle that dropped 6.09% to $798.7m.

Prediction markets

Citizens analyst Jordan Bender has argued that prediction markets do not pose a significant threat to licensed sportsbooks. In his view, the heavy marketing spend of prediction platforms may be bringing new customers into sports betting rather than drawing existing bettors away from regulated operators.

Analysts expect sportsbook handle to rise in the fourth quarter as the NFL season progresses. For iGaming, the question is whether growth stabilises around current levels in the existing states, with legislative expansion to new markets still moving slowly.

Continue Reading

iGaming

SKYCITY OPENS WHOLE-OF-BUSINESS SALE PROCESS AHEAD OF NZ ONLINE LAUNCH

SkyCity Entertainment Group has appointed UBS and Chapman Tripp to run a structured process seeking proposals for the whole business, as it prepares applications for two New Zealand online casino licences.

Published

on

Skycity Opens Whole-Of-Business Sale Process Ahead Of Nz Online Launch

SkyCity Entertainment Group has opened a structured process to seek proposals for the whole of its business, appointing UBS and law firm Chapman Tripp to run it, months after rejecting two takeover approaches it said undervalued the company. The move was set out by chair Julian Cook at the NZX and ASX-listed operator’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Auckland on 21 October, and comes as SkyCity prepares applications for two licences in New Zealand’s new regulated online casino market.

What is under review

The review covers the entire group rather than a single asset. In his address, filed with NZX, Cook said the board had received no improved proposals from the earlier bidders and no whole-of-business proposal from anyone new, but remained aware of continued interest in the company.

“In the interests of shareholders, the Board has decided to seek proposals through a structured process,” Cook said. The process will involve engaging with interested parties and giving them access to some due diligence information so they can develop proposals. UBS is acting as investment banking adviser and Chapman Tripp as legal adviser.

The board has set up a Structured Review sub-committee to oversee the work over the coming months. Cook said the process would “take some time to progress” and that there was no certainty it would lead to any transaction or offer. No timetable or deadline for proposals has been disclosed. He added that the board remained confident in its current strategy but would consider carefully any proposal that delivered greater value for shareholders.

Rejected bids and Adelaide sale

The review follows SkyCity’s disclosure on 25 August that it had received two unsolicited, conditional, non-binding indicative proposals in May. One came from a special situations fund managed by Oaktree Capital Management at NZ$0.70 cash per share, and the other from an unnamed party at an implied NZ$0.75 per share. The board unanimously concluded that both undervalued the company and carried problematic conditions, including at least eight weeks of due diligence and a request not to proceed with asset sales.

The group-level process runs alongside a separate formal sale process for SkyCity Adelaide. Chief executive Jason Walbridge told shareholders that interested parties had approached SkyCity after it announced a strategic review of the South Australian business in August. The company has also reached a non-binding heads of agreement with South Australia’s Minister of Consumer and Business Affairs to resolve outstanding regulatory matters arising from the independent review of the casino, including a A$21m fine.

SkyCity’s asset monetisation programme is expected to deliver close to NZ$300m in gross proceeds by the end of 2026. The sale of Auckland commercial buildings settled at NZ$74.5m in September, and the conditional NZ$221m sale of The Grand Hotel is expected to settle in December.

Online casino licences

The review coincides with SkyCity’s push into New Zealand’s regulated online market under the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026. The company was among the winners of the Department of Internal Affairs’ auction for the right to apply for online casino licences, securing two of the 15 rights through two separate entities at NZ$15m each.

Walbridge said the auction settled within the price scenarios SkyCity had modelled, and that cutting back from the maximum three licences to two was a deliberate capital allocation decision to stay within its risk-adjusted return on capital targets. The company is now preparing its licence applications. Cook described the regulated market as worth more than NZ$1bn a year.

“We believe we can compete strongly in this important market,” Walbridge said, pointing to SkyCity’s 30 years as a land-based operator and its ability to advertise online for the first time. He said SkyCity expected the market to be competitive and would watch advertising levels closely when it goes live in the second half of FY27.

Trading and outlook

SkyCity reported underlying FY26 revenue broadly flat at NZ$822.7m, with gaming revenue down 5.9% after the introduction of carded play at its New Zealand casinos and weaker premium play. Underlying EBITDA fell 22.3% to NZ$181.6m. The company said first-quarter FY27 trading was consistent with the fourth quarter of FY26 and that consumer conditions in New Zealand and Australia remained subdued.

It expects capital expenditure around the midpoint of its NZ$80m to NZ$100m range, plus NZ$30m for the online licences, and is not providing formal guidance because the timing of online market entry has yet to be set. The board aims to resume dividends in FY28.

Any bidder engaging through the structured process would be pricing a business that is part way through a land-based turnaround, an Adelaide exit and an online launch. SkyCity has said it will update shareholders as appropriate.

Continue Reading

Trending